FAA reaches out to industry for fresh technology ideas to prevent runway incursions

Posted by John Keller

WASHINGTON, 25 July 2013. Researchers at the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in Washington are surveying industry to find companies with interest and expertise in technologies to help prevent runway incursion.

Runway incursions describe dangerous situations at airports where an unauthorized aircraft, vehicle, or person is on a runway and threatens collision with aircraft landing or taking off.

The FAA issued a presolicitation (solicitation number 14673) this week for the Runway Incursion Prevention project, which seeks to gather information to conduct possible future research dedicated to airport surface safety as U.S. commercial aviation shifts to the NextGen air traffic management system.

FAA officials caution that this presolicitation not yet a request for proposal (RFP); the nature of the competition has not been determined. FAA officials are considering a research project that will lead to recommendations for systems that warn aircraft pilots in real time of potential runway-incursions without intervention from air traffic control.

Runway incursion (RI) prevention is a longtime priority of the FAA and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), agency officials say. As early as 2000 the NTSB recommended a requirement for all airports with scheduled passenger service to install ground movement safety systems to prevent runway incursions.

These systems, NTSB said, should provide a direct warning capability to flight crews and demonstrate through computer simulations that the systems will, in fact, prevent these kinds of incidents.

Since then The FAA’s Runway Incursion Reduction Program (RIRP) has conducted many research programs and simulations that included several prototype systems to prevent runway incursions.

Most of these projects have involved airport surface surveillance to identify and warn of aircraft or surface vehicles in the wrong places; safety logic to evaluate the interaction between aircraft and vehicles operating at airports; and visual or audible warnings to warnings and vehicle drivers of a possible runway incursion, FAA officials explain.

FAA officials have tried, adopted, and rejected many runway-incursion warning systems that provide direct indications to the cockpit. These include surveillance such as the Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model X (ASDE-X), induction loops embedded in the airport surface, Automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) or a simple video camera.

Annunciation systems tried include relaying indication, alert, or warning of a runway incursion directly to the cockpit without interaction by air traffic controllers that involve visual cues on the airport surface.

Now the FAA wants to take runway-incursion technology to the next level, and officials are asking for industry recommendations to get there.

Any runway-incursion indications must be in real-time to be of any use to a pilot, aircrew, or ground vehicle operator. The time difference between a runway-incursion warning and a life-threatening incident could be a manner of only a few seconds, FAA officials point out. The FAA is interested in ideas from industry involving indication location, typic of indication information, and indication purpose.

Indication location involves indications that are located on the ground outside the cockpit, as well as inside the cockpit. Ground-based indicators, for example, include airport surface lighting and markings. Cockpit indicators, on the other hand, could include automated auditory alerts about runway conditions.

Type of indication involves information about rapidly changing airport elements like the locations of other aircraft or vehicles -- known as active indication, while information about static elements like runways or taxiway intersections is called passive indication.

Proposed indication solutions either should reduce preconditions for human errors or mitigate human error consequences. Systems architectures should integrate direct pilot indication purpose and types using ground-based and/or cockpit-based indication technologies. The goal is to provide several independent layers of protection against runway safety hazards.

Responses should spell out the concept, how it would reduce or eliminate runway-incursion, and how it would interface with other national airspace elements to include electronics, communications, lighting, and markings.

Any concept must address and describe the science, technology, or engineering behind their proposed system or procedures to provide direct runway-incursion indications. For example, does the proposal involve radar, cameras, acoustic sensing, or something similar?

Companies interested should email proposals no later than 23 Aug. 2013 to the FAA's Raymond Glembocki at Raymond.Glembocki@faa.gov. Proposals also can be sent to Glembocki by post or by courier at Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Room 335, Washington, DC 20591.

For questions or concerns contact the FAA's Glembocki by email at Raymond.Glembocki@faa.gov, or by phone at 202-267-3692.

More information is online at https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DOT/FAA/HQ/14673/listing.html.

Easily post a comment below using your Linkedin, Twitter, Google or Facebook account.


The Innovation That Matters™ Quiz

Innovation is one of the key drivers in the Defense industry. View this short video on the role of innovation. Then, simply answer 4 multiple-choice questions correctly to be entered into a drawing to win an Eddie Bauer fleece jacket!

CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR THREE MOST RECENT WINNERS. Eric from L3, Alan from ATK, and Terry from the University of California


Featured Slideshow

Evolution of the American soldier

The American soldier has come a long way since the beginning of the Republic 237 years ago. While uniforms for early soldiers were based on cost and utility, soldiers' clothing eventually considered ballistic protection, increasing storage space, protection from poison gas and other contaminants.

Most Popular Articles

Webcasts

On Demand Webcasts

Engineering the VPX high-speed data path for physical and signal integrity

Join Arrow Electronics and TE Connectivity, for an overview webinar of the standards, technologies and trends involving VITA and TE.

Design Strategy Considerations for DO-178C Certified Multi-core Systems

Join Wind River to learn how system architecture and design choices can minimize your DO-178C certification challenges.

Sponsored by:

Flying, Sailing or Driving - The Rugged, Embedded Intel-based Server that goes where you need it!Flying Sailing or Driving

Leveraging the power of server-class processors is no longer relegated to the confines of data centers. Through several innovations, Mercury Systems has ruggedized Intel’s server-class chips for deployment. ...
Sponsored by:

social activity

All Access Sponsors

View the 2014 Buyer's Guide Now!


Mil & Aero Magazine

April 2014
Volume 25, Issue 4
file

Download Our Apps



iPhone

iPad

Android

Follow Us On...



Newsletters

Military & Aerospace Electronics

Weekly newsletter covering technical content, breaking news and product information
SUBSCRIBE

Defense Executive

Monthly newsletter covering business news and strategic insights for executive managers
SUBSCRIBE

Embedded Computing Report

Monthly newsletter covering news on embedded computing in aerospace, defense and industrial-rugged applications
SUBSCRIBE

Unmanned Vehicles

Monthly newsletter covering news updates for designers of unmanned vehicles
SUBSCRIBE