Infrared-obscuring smoke: let the electro-optical wars begin

By John Keller

Posted by John Keller

Military technology never seems to last long in a vacuum. When one breakthrough system is developed, something able to counter its capabilities usually follows closely behind.

We can see this phenomenon from ancient times. The invention of the stirrup -- every bit as significant as the machine gun and the atom bomb -- enabled soldiers to fight fast and hit hard from horseback. It wasn't long, however, until infantry learned to form squares with spears protruding outward to repel cavalry charges.

The machine gun led to trenches and other concealment. Heat-seeking and radar-guided missiles? Enter flares and chaff dispensers to confuse the missiles' guidance systems. To counter visible-light sensors like cameras and the naked eye, soldiers for centuries have thrown up smoke screens, often with great affect.

Smoke has met its match in recent years with the infrared sensor, which detects heat instead of reflected light. IR sensors are extremely effective at penetrating smoke, dust, and other obscurants. The problem is these sensors are progressively becoming less expensive and more widely available.

The Army has developed separate smoke-emitting weapons to fool visible-light and infrared sensors, but has no one weapon that can counter both. How to regain the edge?

Wired's Danger Room blog has a story entitled Army Looking for Infrared Smoke Screens that talks about efforts at the U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., to develop a bi-spectral smoke/obscurant -- or one kind of smoke screen to hide soldiers from visible-light and infrared sensors.

The Army has issued a Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) solicitation open from 19 Feb. to 19 March for companies to solicit ideas on developing bi-spectral smoke/obscurant material. "This material will form an obscuring screen for the protection of soldiers and platforms against visible and infrared threats (heat seeking missiles, thermal viewer, laser guided missiles, sniper fire, etc.)," the solicitation states.

Intensive chemistry and material science, breakthroughs in vapor phase synthesis, and nanotechnology may be involved in this new bi-spectral obscurant, Army researchers say.

Now let's see what's eventually developed to counter this new weapon.

Previous Blog Posts

The haunting bugle call Taps is 150 years old this summer

May 24, 2012

The Navy's solid-state laser weapon

May 22, 2012

High-performance embedded computing (HPEC) gaining market traction, but its definition remains elusive

May 14, 2012

Did I say $114 million mistake? I meant $351 million.

May 9, 2012

Continuing the conversation

May 7, 2012

Lockheed Martin experimental stealth surface vessel to be scrapped after yielding valuable technology

May 3, 2012

Air Force competes in National Collegiate Cyber Defense competition

April 30, 2012

Will Intel 3rd Generation Intel Core processor make a big splash in embedded computing applications?

April 27, 2012

The $114 million mistake

April 25, 2012

Iran under attack once again

April 23, 2012

High-performance computing for rugged mobile military applications is becoming a hot design issue

April 18, 2012

Is the U.S. getting ready for conflict?

April 16, 2012

Historic obsession about the Titanic sinking 100 years ago wipes Bread and Roses strike from popular memory

April 12, 2012

The future of UAV technology aims high

April 3, 2012

Conference combo

March 30, 2012

We can thank a self-absorbed Congress for hurting national defense if deep automatic defense cuts happen

March 28, 2012

Securing the military network

March 21, 2012

FAA's impending rule on small UAVs may usher in a new era of civil aerial warfare

March 14, 2012

Boeing and Airbus both claim victory in WTO Appeal? That can't be right...

March 12, 2012

The defense industry may be adjusting to a new age of financial austerity

March 7, 2012

What's up with all the anti-tamper technology?

March 5, 2012

Effects of 2013 DOD budget cuts already being felt with program cancellations

February 29, 2012

Top ten technologies the U.S. Army's Rapid Equipping Force is looking for

February 25, 2012

The Aerospace & Defense Bloggers

Ernesto Burden is the publisher of PennWell’s Aerospace & Defense Media Group, including Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence and Avionics Europe.  He’s a father of four, a runner, and an avid digital media enthusiast with a deep background in the intersection of media publishing, digital technology, and social media. He can be reached at ernestob@pennwell.com and on Twitter @aero_ernesto.

John Keller is editor-in-chief of Military & Aerospace Electronics magazine, which provides extensive coverage and analysis of enabling electronic and optoelectronic technologies in military, space, and commercial aviation applications. A member of the Military & Aerospace Electronics staff since the magazine's founding in 1989, Mr. Keller took over as chief editor in 1995.

Skyler Frink is an Assistant Editor of Military & Aerospace Electronics and Avionics Intelligence. Skyler graduated Cum Laude from the University of New Hampshire with a BA in Journalism and a Minor in Information Technology in 2011. He has contributed to many different publications both online and in print throughout his career as a Journalist. Skyler can be reached skylerf@pennwell.com.

Courtney E. Howard, as executive editor, enjoys writing about all things electronics and avionics in PennWell’s burgeoning Aerospace and Defense Group, which encompasses Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence, the Avionics Europe conference, and much more. She’s also a self-proclaimed social-media maven, mil-aero nerd, and avid avionics geek. Connect with Courtney at Courtney@Pennwell.com, @coho on Twitter, and on LinkedIn.

Mil & Aero Magazine

May 2012
Volume 23, Issue 5