All Access


Who knew that a satellite shootdown could cause such hand-wringing?

By John Keller

Posted by John Keller

The shootdown this week of a malfunctioning U.S. radar surveillance satellite, known as USA-193, has got to be one of the biggest Chicken-Little stories I've seen in a long time.

The picture I got from the mainstream press was of an out-of-control spacecraft filled with deadly poison careening toward world population centers to create a disaster of epic proportions in just days or even hours. It was right out of a Marvel comic book.

So the U.S. Navy stepped in and proposed to shoot the rogue satellite down with a ship-based SM-3 missile , originally designed to shatter the warheads of incoming intercontinental ballistic missiles. That ought to take care of the problem.

But you CAN'T, the press wailed. If you shoot it down you'll create an orbiting cloud of poison and lethal metal shrapnel that's the size of Texas ... or Alaska ... or, well, that will be really big! What would happen if that came down on downtown Toledo?

Well, maybe we shouldn't shoot it down, the Pentagon suggested. But you HAVE to shoot it down, the press cried. What if that satellite's fuel tank of poison hydrazine actually hit the Earth intact? Imagine the fatalities!

All right, already, the Navy sighed. We'll shoot it down. Just relax! Well, just do it so ... nothing bad happens, the press nagged, offering to repeat in gory detail the long lists of potential disasters from shooting it down -- or not shooting it down -- that had been churned out for days and days.

So the Navy shot it down Wednesday night. We're saved ... unless anyone gets hit by a piece of satellite or gets a whiff of hydrazine . If that happens there'll be Hell to pay. Let's keep our fingers crossed.

All during these bouts of public weeping and gnashing of teeth, I wondered what the big deal was. Let's look at the options.

First, what if we did nothing? Well, the satellite would probably burn up on re-entering the Earth's atmosphere, with a few residual small pieces falling in the ocean or in some farmer's field. The hydrazine fuel would ignite in the atmosphere, with little likelihood that any would make it to the ground.

Space junk does fall out of the sky from time to time, you know. On a visit to the Air Force Space Command in Los Angeles a few years ago, I noticed several blackened chunks of metal mounted on pedestals on display. I asked what they were, and they turned out to be space junk that fell out of orbit and landed on the ground as they were. Some were pretty big, too.

I never heard about even one of those rogue space chunks when they fell out of the sky. Funny how that could happen.

Okay, what about the second option of shooting the satellite down? A satellite is slower and more predictable than an incoming ICBM warhead, so this most likely would be a pretty easy shot for the Navy's SM-3 missiles tipped with the Lightweight Exo-Atmospheric Projectile (LEAP).

Let's see now, that rogue satellite was traveling at about 17,000 miles per hour. The SM-3, once it gets moving, goes about 6,000 miles an hour. Even at an oblique angle, think of the closing speed. I've seen some pretty hairy car crashes out on Route 128 near Boston, where there wasn't much left. Those cars were probably going about 60 miles an hour, give or take.

I really don't think there was much left of the satellite after that LEAP-tipped SM-3 got through with it. I had to laugh when people wondered if the missile would break the satellite's fuel tank.

So what did we achieve by shooting down that satellite? Much, actually, and none of it had anything whatsoever to do with averting a disaster.

Remember when the Chinese used a missile to shoot down one of their own satellites about a year ago? I think shooting down USA-193 was just a nice way to let the Chinese know that we can do it, too. We'd probably also be pretty good at shooting down incoming ICBMs. Everyone see that?

So there it is. But I guess it was a pretty fun ride while it lasted. I think it's safe to say, however, that if the U.S. and China ever get in a shooting war, that a lot of satellites are going to come down real fast. That's the other lesson of USA-193.

The photo above is of U.S. Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Andrew Jackson as he activates a modified tactical SM-3 missile from the guided missile cruiser USS Lake Erie last Wednesday. The accompanying video is the shootdown of a malfunctioning satellite.

Easily post a comment below using your Linkedin, Twitter, Google or Facebook account.

Previous Blog Posts

Ron Mastro: an unforgettable figure in the aerospace and defense electronics industry

Tue Apr 23 07:45:00 CDT 2013

Mil & Aero Publisher Ernesto Burden unhurt after bombs hit today's Boston Marathon

Mon Apr 15 15:04:00 CDT 2013

After all those sleepless nights of worry, now we find the Pentagon's budget is actually UP?

Wed Apr 10 11:54:00 CDT 2013

Confederate surrender at Appomattox ended the American Civil War 148 years ago this month

Tue Apr 09 10:22:00 CDT 2013

Dear God, what more can the U.S. military ask from the poor letter C?

Fri Apr 05 10:23:00 CDT 2013

Saber rattling in North Korea: how dangerous are these threats?

Tue Apr 02 10:26:00 CDT 2013

At last, some good news; is our industry really ready for this?

Tue Mar 26 09:24:00 CDT 2013

Teledyne Technologies becoming major player in unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) sensors

Tue Mar 19 09:46:00 CDT 2013

Is sequestration killing aerospace and defense trade shows?

Thu Mar 14 11:27:00 CDT 2013

Nuclear ballistic missile technology remains a post-Cold-War defense priority

Tue Mar 12 09:22:00 CDT 2013

The sequester hits! Is everyone okay?

Tue Mar 05 09:46:00 CST 2013

The continuing drone war of low-tech vs. high-tech

Tue Feb 26 12:30:00 CST 2013

Prospects for high-performance embedded computing (HPEC) look brighter than ever before

Tue Feb 19 10:09:00 CST 2013

Self-sealing suction cups show promise for future robots

Mon Feb 11 11:32:00 CST 2013

Air Force moving forward with potential upgrades to PAVE PAWS, BMEWS, and PARCS missile-defense radar

Thu Feb 07 13:32:00 CST 2013

Cyberattacks carried out against media outlets

Mon Feb 04 15:49:00 CST 2013

Quest for the humvee-mounted mobile data center for the battlefield edge

Wed Jan 30 11:40:00 CST 2013

Dempsey worries about cyberattack, DoD makes plans to hire additional cybersecurity workers

Mon Jan 28 14:16:00 CST 2013

Defense industry will emerge from these hard times stronger than ever

Thu Jan 24 11:07:00 CST 2013

More on our favorite quadruped robot, the LS3

Mon Jan 21 14:09:00 CST 2013

Wave of aerospace and defense company acquisitions may be indication of things to come

Thu Jan 17 10:05:00 CST 2013

First the power grid, now banks under attack

Mon Jan 14 12:28:00 CST 2013

Hagel as defense secretary another indication the U.S. military budget is headed downward

Wed Jan 09 11:51:00 CST 2013

NSA's cybersecurity program to protect critical infrastructure revealed

Mon Jan 07 09:41:00 CST 2013

Fiscal-cliff negotiations reward defense industry with even more uncertainty

Thu Jan 03 10:31:00 CST 2013

The Aerospace & Defense Bloggers

John Keller is editor-in-chief of Military & Aerospace Electronics magazine, which provides extensive coverage and analysis of enabling electronic and optoelectronic technologies in military, space, and commercial aviation applications. A member of the Military & Aerospace Electronics staff since the magazine's founding in 1989, Mr. Keller took over as chief editor in 1995.

Ernesto Burden is the publisher of PennWell’s Aerospace & Defense Media Group, including Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence and Avionics Europe.  He’s a father of four, a runner, and an avid digital media enthusiast with a deep background in the intersection of media publishing, digital technology, and social media. He can be reached at ernestob@pennwell.com and on Twitter @aero_ernesto.

Courtney E. Howard, as executive editor, enjoys writing about all things electronics and avionics in PennWell’s burgeoning Aerospace and Defense Group, which encompasses Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence, the Avionics Europe conference, and much more. She’s also a self-proclaimed social-media maven, mil-aero nerd, and avid avionics geek. Connect with Courtney at Courtney@Pennwell.com, @coho on Twitter, and on LinkedIn.

Mil & Aero Magazine

April 2013
Volume 24, Issue 4
file

Download Our Free Apps



iPhone

iPad

Android

Follow Us On...