Are low-profile, quick-turnaround military contracts replacing the traditional procurement process?

By John Keller

Posted by John Keller.

Defense industry suppliers tell me that military solicitations and contract awards moving through traditional procurement channels have slowed to a trickle, as military program managers safeguard their budgets by delaying or cancelling procurements that had been in the pipeline. That's the bad news.

The good news is that RFPs and contracts moving through non-traditional procurement channels appear to be picking up. These kinds of procurements typically involve small-scale, quick-turnaround contracts for urgently needed component replacements and upgrades that often take place right in the field.

The military seems to be moving in the direction of these quick procurements because they can be kept at a low profile, often involve limited numbers of platforms, and are kept spread out and reasonably priced. Translated, that means the military services can keep their weapons systems functioning and up to date with reduced threat from the bean-counting budget cutters in the Pentagon.

This seems to be a win-win situation for the military services that need new technology, as well as for defense suppliers providing subsystems like embedded computing, rugged displays, and high-reliability data storage. Those in the defense industry can maintain their cash flow while they wait for traditional procurement channels to open up once more -- if they ever really do.

There's a dark side to this approach, however: those in the defense industry are losing trust in the traditional procurement system. It's possible they are becoming less inclined to respond promptly to traditional procurement programs, and sometimes are reluctant to submit bids at all, where in the recent past they would have been jumping on these programs with enthusiasm.

"We have to be extremely sharp in choosing the horse we want to ride, so we can be reasonably sure the horse will finish the race, and not go lame in the process," one supplier told me recently.

Perhaps there's a silver lining to all this. This could be the beginning of the kind of organic defense procurement reform that ultimately could speed all kinds of military technology procurement, and lessen the instances of these monolithic procurements that take forever, cost billions, and succeed only in fielding obsolete technology.

Previous Blog Posts

The haunting bugle call Taps is 150 years old this summer

May 24, 2012

The Navy's solid-state laser weapon

May 22, 2012

High-performance embedded computing (HPEC) gaining market traction, but its definition remains elusive

May 14, 2012

Did I say $114 million mistake? I meant $351 million.

May 9, 2012

Continuing the conversation

May 7, 2012

Lockheed Martin experimental stealth surface vessel to be scrapped after yielding valuable technology

May 3, 2012

Air Force competes in National Collegiate Cyber Defense competition

April 30, 2012

Will Intel 3rd Generation Intel Core processor make a big splash in embedded computing applications?

April 27, 2012

The $114 million mistake

April 25, 2012

Iran under attack once again

April 23, 2012

High-performance computing for rugged mobile military applications is becoming a hot design issue

April 18, 2012

Is the U.S. getting ready for conflict?

April 16, 2012

Historic obsession about the Titanic sinking 100 years ago wipes Bread and Roses strike from popular memory

April 12, 2012

The future of UAV technology aims high

April 3, 2012

Conference combo

March 30, 2012

We can thank a self-absorbed Congress for hurting national defense if deep automatic defense cuts happen

March 28, 2012

Securing the military network

March 21, 2012

FAA's impending rule on small UAVs may usher in a new era of civil aerial warfare

March 14, 2012

Boeing and Airbus both claim victory in WTO Appeal? That can't be right...

March 12, 2012

The defense industry may be adjusting to a new age of financial austerity

March 7, 2012

What's up with all the anti-tamper technology?

March 5, 2012

Effects of 2013 DOD budget cuts already being felt with program cancellations

February 29, 2012

Top ten technologies the U.S. Army's Rapid Equipping Force is looking for

February 25, 2012

The Aerospace & Defense Bloggers

Ernesto Burden is the publisher of PennWell’s Aerospace & Defense Media Group, including Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence and Avionics Europe.  He’s a father of four, a runner, and an avid digital media enthusiast with a deep background in the intersection of media publishing, digital technology, and social media. He can be reached at ernestob@pennwell.com and on Twitter @aero_ernesto.

John Keller is editor-in-chief of Military & Aerospace Electronics magazine, which provides extensive coverage and analysis of enabling electronic and optoelectronic technologies in military, space, and commercial aviation applications. A member of the Military & Aerospace Electronics staff since the magazine's founding in 1989, Mr. Keller took over as chief editor in 1995.

Skyler Frink is an Assistant Editor of Military & Aerospace Electronics and Avionics Intelligence. Skyler graduated Cum Laude from the University of New Hampshire with a BA in Journalism and a Minor in Information Technology in 2011. He has contributed to many different publications both online and in print throughout his career as a Journalist. Skyler can be reached skylerf@pennwell.com.

Courtney E. Howard, as executive editor, enjoys writing about all things electronics and avionics in PennWell’s burgeoning Aerospace and Defense Group, which encompasses Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence, the Avionics Europe conference, and much more. She’s also a self-proclaimed social-media maven, mil-aero nerd, and avid avionics geek. Connect with Courtney at Courtney@Pennwell.com, @coho on Twitter, and on LinkedIn.

Mil & Aero Magazine

May 2012
Volume 23, Issue 5