Are we on the verge of a new era of technological innovation?

By John Keller

When it comes to military technology development, everyone knows it's been tough for the past year or so. Research money from the Pentagon has slowed to a trickle, contracting has been stretched out or cancelled altogether, and uncertainty in defense budgets has encouraged companies to hold on to their cash for as long as they can.

Still, there are encouraging signs that the culture of military technology development may be changing. Don't get me wrong, it's more in the realm of tough-love than it is in prospects for more government funding, but if the defense industry plays its cards right, we may be on the verge of a new era in technological innovation, with the added benefit of tossing out some of the old, inefficient business practices in the bargain.

First, there are indications that defense technology companies aren't waiting anymore for internal research and development (IRAD) money from the Pentagon. Instead, they may be more inclined to fund crucial research themselves without government help. Second, Pentagon officials -- at least in their rhetoric -- appear to be favoring fixed-price contracting these days, rather than older contract vehicles that inadvertently encouraged low-ball bidding and cost overruns.

Together, these two trends have the potential to shake the defense industry out of its old way of doing business, and perhaps spark a new and efficient way of developing aerospace and defense technology.

Companies that fund their own IRAD are betting on their own success with their own money. Those who do so are more than likely to pick the strongest and most promising technologies. Second, an emphasis on fixed-price contracting rewards the most nimble and efficient companies, and those that are good at fixed-price contracting will be the winners in any upcoming industry shakeout.

This is no guarantee that such a transformation is in the works. Even if it is, this process will take a long time -- five to ten years, most likely. No one -- in industry or in the Pentagon -- is comfortable with a new way of doing business. Left to their own devices, all concerned would rather remain what they've been comfortable with for years.

Still, if pressure is applied long enough and strongly enough, we might be seeing the start of something big. After all, history shows us that the dinosaurs eventually die out, and the mammals take over.

Previous Blog Posts

The haunting bugle call Taps is 150 years old this summer

May 24, 2012

The Navy's solid-state laser weapon

May 22, 2012

High-performance embedded computing (HPEC) gaining market traction, but its definition remains elusive

May 14, 2012

Did I say $114 million mistake? I meant $351 million.

May 9, 2012

Continuing the conversation

May 7, 2012

Lockheed Martin experimental stealth surface vessel to be scrapped after yielding valuable technology

May 3, 2012

Air Force competes in National Collegiate Cyber Defense competition

April 30, 2012

Will Intel 3rd Generation Intel Core processor make a big splash in embedded computing applications?

April 27, 2012

The $114 million mistake

April 25, 2012

Iran under attack once again

April 23, 2012

High-performance computing for rugged mobile military applications is becoming a hot design issue

April 18, 2012

Is the U.S. getting ready for conflict?

April 16, 2012

Historic obsession about the Titanic sinking 100 years ago wipes Bread and Roses strike from popular memory

April 12, 2012

The future of UAV technology aims high

April 3, 2012

Conference combo

March 30, 2012

We can thank a self-absorbed Congress for hurting national defense if deep automatic defense cuts happen

March 28, 2012

Securing the military network

March 21, 2012

FAA's impending rule on small UAVs may usher in a new era of civil aerial warfare

March 14, 2012

Boeing and Airbus both claim victory in WTO Appeal? That can't be right...

March 12, 2012

The defense industry may be adjusting to a new age of financial austerity

March 7, 2012

What's up with all the anti-tamper technology?

March 5, 2012

Effects of 2013 DOD budget cuts already being felt with program cancellations

February 29, 2012

Top ten technologies the U.S. Army's Rapid Equipping Force is looking for

February 25, 2012

The Aerospace & Defense Bloggers

Ernesto Burden is the publisher of PennWell’s Aerospace & Defense Media Group, including Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence and Avionics Europe.  He’s a father of four, a runner, and an avid digital media enthusiast with a deep background in the intersection of media publishing, digital technology, and social media. He can be reached at ernestob@pennwell.com and on Twitter @aero_ernesto.

John Keller is editor-in-chief of Military & Aerospace Electronics magazine, which provides extensive coverage and analysis of enabling electronic and optoelectronic technologies in military, space, and commercial aviation applications. A member of the Military & Aerospace Electronics staff since the magazine's founding in 1989, Mr. Keller took over as chief editor in 1995.

Skyler Frink is an Assistant Editor of Military & Aerospace Electronics and Avionics Intelligence. Skyler graduated Cum Laude from the University of New Hampshire with a BA in Journalism and a Minor in Information Technology in 2011. He has contributed to many different publications both online and in print throughout his career as a Journalist. Skyler can be reached skylerf@pennwell.com.

Courtney E. Howard, as executive editor, enjoys writing about all things electronics and avionics in PennWell’s burgeoning Aerospace and Defense Group, which encompasses Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence, the Avionics Europe conference, and much more. She’s also a self-proclaimed social-media maven, mil-aero nerd, and avid avionics geek. Connect with Courtney at Courtney@Pennwell.com, @coho on Twitter, and on LinkedIn.

Mil & Aero Magazine

May 2012
Volume 23, Issue 5