All Access


More meaningless posturing over "automatic" cuts in the defense budget

By John Keller

Posted by John Keller

I don't know whether to be amused or frustrated over political rhetoric coming out of Washington about these so-called "automatic" cuts in the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) budget over the next decade if Congress doesn't either reduce projected spending or raise taxes.

First, talking about "required" defense budget cuts right now anywhere beyond federal fiscal year 2013 is just silly, empty, political fluff. I get tired of beating this dead horse, but I'll say it again: Congress does whatever it wants to do on a year-by-year basis. There are NO "required" cuts in the future because every Congress acts on its own , regardless of promises made in the past.

Nothing's binding; it's all just a bunch of talk. Rather shocking behavior to see from Washington, don't you think?

Look at the stories making the rounds over the past few days containing dire predictions of hurting our national defense due to potential "automatic cuts totaling an additional half a trillion dollars" ... "if Congress fails to enact additional deficit reduction legislation by the end of the year." You can read rhetoric like that in a story today in the Los Angeles Times entitled "Pentagon says projected spending cuts could undermine security ."

Take a close look at these stories. They all contain caveats like "unless Congress decided to overturn the cuts." IF Congress were to overturn the cuts? They actually mean WHEN Congress overturns the cuts, as lawmakers, in their wisdom and calculation, undoubtedly will do.

They always do.

Every Congress acts on its own every federal fiscal year. They're bound by nothing in the past. They start every year out with a clean slate. Overturning commitments made in the past is just part of the routine, and can be predicted like the sun rising in the east.

So, with this in mind, every dire prediction you read about "automatic" defense cuts over the next 10 years is all just political theater performed to exert pressure for the perceived need to do something now. In this case the pressure being applied is about raising taxes, and the rhetoric is intended to hold the DOD budget hostage to make that happen.

The budget will be cut drastically in the future unless Congress enacts new taxes, we hear from Washington. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta trotted out a statement this week warning these deep cuts in the defense budget would hurt national security, and that the American people should accept higher taxes, rather than deep cuts in the defense budget.

It's right off the Obama Administration script. Panetta delivered his lines like the Democrat party pro he is. I remember years ago interviewing Panetta in his Capitol Hill office when he was a congressman representing Monterey, Calif. He was a skilled, experienced political infighter then, and he's a skilled, experienced political infighter today. Same party, same script, different job.

So, if you find yourself starting to get worked up over future military budget cuts based on what you're hearing out of Washington, just take a breath and remind yourself that this is only a movie.

Because that's all it is.

Easily post a comment below using your Linkedin, Twitter, Google or Facebook account.

Previous Blog Posts

SWAPped: how size, weight, and power are transforming the military electronics industry

May 21, 2013

China continues to improve capabilities in carrier-based military aviation

May 14, 2013

Small is more: SWAP for soldier systems and unmanned vehicles dominates today's technology

May 7, 2013

The defense budget is here: time to get to work

April 29, 2013

Ron Mastro: an unforgettable figure in the aerospace and defense electronics industry

April 23, 2013

Mil & Aero Publisher Ernesto Burden unhurt after bombs hit today's Boston Marathon

April 15, 2013

After all those sleepless nights of worry, now we find the Pentagon's budget is actually UP?

April 10, 2013

Confederate surrender at Appomattox ended the American Civil War 148 years ago this month

April 9, 2013

Dear God, what more can the U.S. military ask from the poor letter C?

April 5, 2013

Saber rattling in North Korea: how dangerous are these threats?

April 2, 2013

At last, some good news; is our industry really ready for this?

March 26, 2013

Teledyne Technologies becoming major player in unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) sensors

March 19, 2013

Is sequestration killing aerospace and defense trade shows?

March 14, 2013

Nuclear ballistic missile technology remains a post-Cold-War defense priority

March 12, 2013

The sequester hits! Is everyone okay?

March 5, 2013

The continuing drone war of low-tech vs. high-tech

February 26, 2013

Prospects for high-performance embedded computing (HPEC) look brighter than ever before

February 19, 2013

Self-sealing suction cups show promise for future robots

February 11, 2013

Air Force moving forward with potential upgrades to PAVE PAWS, BMEWS, and PARCS missile-defense radar

February 7, 2013

Cyberattacks carried out against media outlets

February 4, 2013

Quest for the humvee-mounted mobile data center for the battlefield edge

January 30, 2013

Dempsey worries about cyberattack, DoD makes plans to hire additional cybersecurity workers

January 28, 2013

Defense industry will emerge from these hard times stronger than ever

January 24, 2013

More on our favorite quadruped robot, the LS3

January 21, 2013

Wave of aerospace and defense company acquisitions may be indication of things to come

January 17, 2013

The Aerospace & Defense Bloggers

John Keller is editor-in-chief of Military & Aerospace Electronics magazine, which provides extensive coverage and analysis of enabling electronic and optoelectronic technologies in military, space, and commercial aviation applications. A member of the Military & Aerospace Electronics staff since the magazine's founding in 1989, Mr. Keller took over as chief editor in 1995.

Ernesto Burden is the publisher of PennWell’s Aerospace & Defense Media Group, including Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence and Avionics Europe.  He’s a father of four, a runner, and an avid digital media enthusiast with a deep background in the intersection of media publishing, digital technology, and social media. He can be reached at ernestob@pennwell.com and on Twitter @aero_ernesto.

Courtney E. Howard, as executive editor, enjoys writing about all things electronics and avionics in PennWell’s burgeoning Aerospace and Defense Group, which encompasses Military & Aerospace Electronics, Avionics Intelligence, the Avionics Europe conference, and much more. She’s also a self-proclaimed social-media maven, mil-aero nerd, and avid avionics geek. Connect with Courtney at Courtney@Pennwell.com, @coho on Twitter, and on LinkedIn.

Mil & Aero Magazine

April 2013
Volume 24, Issue 4
file

Download Our Free Apps



iPhone

iPad

Android

Follow Us On...