Deadly Boeing crashes raise questions about commercial aircraft avionics automation

March 18, 2019
WASHINGTON – Two Boeing 737 Max 8 jets, a variant of the world’s most popular jetliner, crashed within six months of each other in a rate of failure that raises questions about the airplane’s cockpit automation. The Verge reports.
WASHINGTON – Two Boeing 737 Max 8 jets, a variant of the world’s most popular jetliner, crashed within six months of each other in a rate of failure that raises questions about the airplane’s cockpit automation. The Verge reports. Continue reading original article

The Military & Aerospace Electronics take:

18 March 2019 -- Preliminary data from the first of the crashes, Lion Air Flight 610, suggests that the automated system forced the plane into a steep dive soon after takeoff. At least half a dozen pilots have complained about unexpected nose dives from the system.

To be sure, automation is widely used in commercial avionics and has been praised for making the skies much safer. But there are growing concerns among pilots and safety experts that the industry is relying too much on automation, especially overly complex systems.

Boeing, meanwhile, is facing questions about its decisions to withhold information from regulators about the anti-stall technology implicated in the Lion Air crash.

Related: Sikorsky to perfect cockpit automation kits for fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters

Related: Navy asks Lockheed Martin to maintain and upgrade as many as 400 old CASS avionics test systems

Related: Rockwell to Change Name to Rockwell Automation after Rockwell Collins spinoff

John Keller, chief editor
Military & Aerospace Electronics

Ready to make a purchase? Search the Military & Aerospace Electronics Buyer's Guide for companies, new products, press releases, and videos

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Military Aerospace, create an account today!