Defense electronics industry readies for business with Trump Administration

It's only been a month since the U.S. elected Donald Trump as its next president, and the mood of the U.S. defense industry is more upbeat than I've seen it in years.

John Keller New

It's only been a month since the U.S. elected Donald Trump as its next president, and the mood of the U.S. defense industry is more upbeat than I've seen it in years.

With just another month until Trump takes office, we've seen stocks of defense companies like BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin increase sharply, new names floated for Trump's secretary of defense, and hints that Trump aims to rebuild U.S. military forces following peace-through-strength policies similar to his predecessor, Ronald Reagan.

You can't blame defense experts for feeling giddy over Trump's election; it's the first political rhetoric we've seen in quite some time concerning a big boost in support for military spending and supporting military priorities.

This is an industry that for the past eight-plus years has lived under a cloud of defense budget reductions, arms-control policies, several threats of across-the-board budget cuts known as sequestration, and a brutal attrition that effectively has hollowed-out the Pentagon's top officer corps. This is an industry that's ready for good news, and Trump's election is more than most ever dreamed. President-elect Trump has voiced military priorities that include modernizing the nation's aging nuclear weapons arsenal; securing critical infrastructure from cyber attacks; and using U.S. military power only to advance American national interests.

As an aside, however, I would recommend that Americans take a breath before we move forward. Those on the right are ready to let the good times roll, while those on the left are anticipating grotesque violations of human rights. I doubt we'll see either one as expected.

President Trump is bound to frustrate and infuriate those on the right and left in equal measure. He'll be called everything from traitor to the cause to a closet liberal. I think we all can agree that we need a higher employment rate, increases in paychecks, and peace abroad. Let's hope that's the direction we'll go.

On the national security front, it's worth quoting Trump's defense and national security priorities as posted on the president-elect's transition team website at www.greatagain.gov. "America's stature in the world is determined by its values, prosperity and might," the site reads. "Donald Trump understands how a strong, prosperous economy underwrites military might, and how a strong, robust military secures our way of life and the fruits of our economy. Mr. Trump recognizes that we cannot tackle challenges, especially threats to our security, unless we define the problem in a way that American resources and instruments of power can be applied against them.

"To this end, Mr. Trump recognizes the long-term threat posed to our nation and our allies by radical ideologies that direct and inspire terrorism," the site continues. "A Trump Administration will be committed to both immediate and sustainable actions to counter the threats posed by these radical ideologies. A Trump Administration also recognizes the uniquely catastrophic threats posed by nuclear weapons and cyber attacks. Mr. Trump will ensure our strategic nuclear triad is modernized to ensure it continues to be an effective deterrent, and his Administration will review and minimize our nation's infrastructure vulnerabilities to cyber threats. Mr. Trump will be a strong Commander-in-Chief befitting our American men and women in uniform, and ensure their sacrifices will only be made in operations that safeguard the interests of the American people and our allies, and that their service will be honored as they enter the ranks of veterans."

Attentions are now turned to those who might head-up Trump Administration cabinet and other senior-level positions for defense and national security, such as secretary of defense, secretary of state, secretary of homeland security, and director of national intelligence.

More in Communications