WASHINGTON, 3 Feb. 2006. President Bush's 2007 budget seeks a nearly five percent increase in Defense Department spending, to $439.3 billion, with significantly more money for weapons programs, according to senior Pentagon officials and documents obtained by The Associated Press.
The request does not include funding for the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
The budget figures, to be unveiled next week, come as the Pentagon prepares to release a separate long-range strategy to reshape the military into a more agile fighting force better able to fight terrorism, while still preserving its ability to wage large conventional wars.
More than a year in the making and scheduled to be released Friday, the strategy review represents the broader thinking that guides how the dollars are spent. It does not call for the elimination of any of the largest weapons programs, as some had expected.
Instead it proposes cutting some smaller programs such as the E-10 surveillance plane, reducing the size of the Air Force, overhauling the Army National Guard and increasing the number of special operations forces like the Green Berets, whose role in the global war on terrorism is rapidly expanding.
The budget, meanwhile, would include $84.2 billion for weapons programs, a nearly eight percent increase, including billions of dollars for fighter jets, Navy ships, helicopters and unmanned aircraft. The total includes a substantial increase in weapons spending for the Army, which would get $16.8 billion in the 2007 budget, compared with $11 billion this year.
Overall, the budget plan would give the Army $111.8 billion, including $42.6 billion for personnel. The Army National Guard would receive about $5.25 billion for personnel, and the Army Reserves would receive $3.4 billion.
Other programs funded in the budget include:
* $3.3 billion for the Army's key weapons program, the Future Combat System;
* $583 million for nearly 3,100 more heavily armored Humvees;
* Nearly $800 million for 100 Stryker transport vehicles, built by General Dynamics Land Systems;
* $2.2 billion for the F-22 fighter (plans are to buy 20 of the aircraft, built by Maryland-based Lockheed Martin, each year in 2008, 2009 and 2010);
* $2.5 billion for the next Virginia class submarine;
* $360 million in the budget for development of the new CH53K heavy lift helicopter, built by Connecticut-based Sikorsky Aircraft for the Marine Corps;
* $5.6 billion for programs for military families, including child care and tuition assistance;
* about $1.8 billion for 81 Army Black Hawk and Navy Hawk helicopters; and
* $1.3 billion for five new Joint Strike Fighters.
Senior defense officials provided the totals on condition of anonymity because the defense budget was not being released publicly until Monday. The figures did not include about $50 billion that Bush administration officials said Thursday they would request as a down payment for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2007. The administration said war costs for 2006 would total $120 billion.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld would not provide any details of the budget Thursday but called it appropriate. "We have been able to fund the important things that are needed. It is a sizable amount of money," he said.
The budget proposal represents the fifth consecutive year that spending on weapons has increased, after years of cutbacks during the 1990s.
And it gives a more detailed view of the broader themes in the strategy plan, known as the Quadrennial Defense Review. The themes include how the Pentagon needs to collaborate better with other government agencies in the war on terrorism; that the government must forge closer partnerships with other countries to battle terrorists, and that there must be greater investments in efforts to gather, process and distribute intelligence.
John Hamre, president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank, said he was not troubled by the lack of program cuts in the Rumsfeld plan.
"It's the common parlance in Washington to measure big decisions by how many trophies are hung on the wall, how many dead animals are hung on the wall that you shot and killed," he said. "That's the wrong way to look at this."
Source: Associated Press